Review by Dominic Corr

Front Room at Assembly St.Andrews Square

Time is a remarkably effective dramatic device when a playwright understands exactly how to weaponise it. In 44 Minutes, writer Lev Steinberg strips theatre back to one of its most primal questions: what happens when ordinary people are forced to make an impossible choice? The result is a tense, intelligent psychological thriller that thrives on uncertainty.

Directed by Michael DeFilippis, the production wastes little time establishing its oppressive atmosphere. The moment the audience enters the space; time is of the essence. Four strangers awaken inside a cage, subjected to a chilling ultimatum. Within forty-four minutes, they must collectively determine which one of them will die. Survival rests not on strength or luck, but persuasion. As the clock relentlessly counts down, every conversation becomes a negotiation and every revelation potentially life-altering.

What initially appears to be a straightforward moral dilemma rapidly evolves into something more unsettling. Steinberg’s script is at its strongest when examining the uncomfortable calculations people make when confronted by fear. The discussions surrounding worth, responsibility and survival are fascinating precisely because there are no easy answers. Instead, the play allows competing viewpoints to collide, creating an atmosphere in which certainty becomes increasingly elusive.

Central to the production’s success is an exceptionally strong cast. John Billingsley brings a quiet humanity to his character, grounding much of the drama with an understated sincerity that proves increasingly important as tensions rise, while Dorian Missick delivers a compelling performance filled with suspicion and volatility, capturing a man whose confidence masks a growing sense of vulnerability. Alongside them, Matthew Petrick offers an engaging portrayal of youthful idealism under pressure, and Christopher Ryan shoulders much of the play’s mystery with impressive control. Together, the quartet develop a believable dynamic that shifts constantly as alliances emerge, fracture and reform.

DeFilippis displays a strong understanding of how confinement can shape theatrical storytelling. The physical restrictions of the cage become an active component of the drama, forcing the performers into proximity and amplifying every accusation, disagreement and moment of doubt. The staging rarely feels static, despite the limited playing space, with careful blocking ensuring visual interest throughout.

If there is a weakness, it lies in the play’s final movement. The narrative’s late revelations are undoubtedly ambitious and provide a considerable shift in perspective. While the twist adds another layer to the production’s themes, it does not entirely carry the same weight as the gripping psychological battle that precedes it. The strongest material remains the moral conflict itself rather than the broader framework that eventually emerges around it.

Nevertheless, 44 Minutes remains a thoroughly engaging piece of theatre. It combines the immediacy of a thriller with the philosophical edge of a morality play, creating a production that is both entertaining and thought-provoking. Steinberg’s script asks difficult questions without offering comfortable solutions, and the cast embrace that ambiguity with conviction.

In an Edinburgh Fringe landscape crowded with psychological dramas, 44 Minutes distinguishes itself through sharp performances, sustained tension and a premise that lingers long after the countdown reaches zero. It may not answer every question it raises, but its willingness to leave audiences sitting with those questions is ultimately part of its strength.

---